brd_l
spacer
spacer
Facebook LinkedIn

New York City
521 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10175
Tel: (212) 682-0020
Fax: (212) 682-9380
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

Long Island NY
1205 Franklin Avenue
Garden City, NY 11530
Tel: (516) 746-0070
Fax: (516) 746-0599
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

New Jersey
740 Broad Street
Suite 2
Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: (732) 379-6020
Fax: (732) 345-9444
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

Florida (by appointment only)
2000 Glades Road
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Tel: (800) 935-8480
Fax: (651) 613-4100
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

about us

CLIENT UPDATE

Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson LLP
521 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10175
Tel: (212) 682-0020


May 30, 2007

United States Supreme Court Decision on EEOC Filing Deadlines for Alleged Discrimination in Pay

On May 29, 2007, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision concerning the deadline for filing a charge for discriminatory pay-setting decisions. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. (U.S. No. 05-1074 5/29/07). Justice Alito, writing for the majority, held that an employee has 180 or 300 days (depending on the State) from the date of the alleged unlawful employment practice in which to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, rejected Ledbetter's argument that each paycheck which reflected an implementation of an allegedly discriminatory pay-setting decision constituted a new violation of Title VII and, therefore, allowed an employee to sue on that decision. Any difference in pay which is allegedly the result of a decision made before the commencement of the EEOC charging period is not actionable. In making its decision, the Court pointed to two aims of statutes of limitations, repose for potential employer-defendants and assurance that evidence would be preserved. The Court explained that evidence relating to an employer's alleged intentional discrimination in pay-setting is likely to fade quickly.
Justice Ginsberg's dissent urged Congress to correct what she sees as the Court's misinterpretation of Title VII. According to an article in the May 30, 2007 New York Times, Senator Clinton of New York intends to submit a bill which would overturn the Court's decision in Ledbetter.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions.

   

Home | Attorneys | Client Updates | News | Client Rights | Contact Us
Labor/Employment | Litigation | Trust/Estates | Trust/Estates Litigation | Corporate

Copyright © 2006 Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson LLP
Disclaimer/ Attorney Advertising / Site created by Pin Design Inc.

brd_r
Home Attorneys Client Updates News Client Rights Contact Us Labor/Employment Trust/Estates Litigation Corporate Trust/Estates Litigation