brd_l
spacer
spacer
Facebook LinkedIn

New York City
521 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10175
Tel: (212) 682-0020
Fax: (212) 682-9380
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

Long Island NY
1205 Franklin Avenue
Garden City, NY 11530
Tel: (516) 746-0070
Fax: (516) 746-0599
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

New Jersey
740 Broad Street
Suite 2
Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
Tel: (732) 379-6020
Fax: (732) 345-9444
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

Florida (by appointment only)
2000 Glades Road
Suite 300
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Tel: (800) 935-8480
Fax: (651) 613-4100
email: info@putneylaw.com
Get Directions

about us

CLIENT UPDATE

Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson LLP
521 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10175
Tel: (212) 682-0020


November 12, 2010

NLRB Charges Employer for Illegal Termination of Employee for Facebook Comments

On October 27, 2010, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) filed an unfair labor practice complaint against an employer that terminated an employee in part because she violated the employer’s social networking policy by posting critical comments regarding her supervisor on Facebook.  The Board alleges that the employee’s Facebook comments constitute protected concerted activity under the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”), and thus, the employer could not terminate her for posting the comments.

The Act prohibits employers from taking adverse employment action against employees, regardless of whether they belong to a labor union, for engaging in protected concerted activity. Employees engage in protected concerted activity when two or more employees communicate with each other about wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.  In this case, the activity involved two or more employees because co-workers responded to the employee’s comments with their own comments on Facebook.  The Board alleges that the employer’s social networking policy is overbroad because it prohibits conduct, such as communicating or conversing on Facebook, that constitutes protected concerted activity. The employer’s policy contains several sections addressing internet posting and blogging and prohibits employees from making “disparaging, discriminatory or defamatory comments when discussing the company or the employee’s superiors, co-workers and/or competitors.”  The Board alleges that the policy interferes with employees’ right to engage in protected concerted activity. 

* * *

The case raises important issues about the limits of speech, conduct and the application to social networking.  We recommend that all employers review their social networking policies.  If you should have any questions regarding this case or your social networking policies, please contact us.

   

Home | Attorneys | Client Updates | News | Client Rights | Contact Us
Labor/Employment | Litigation | Trust/Estates | Trust/Estates Litigation | Corporate

Copyright © 2006 Putney, Twombly, Hall & Hirson LLP
Disclaimer/ Attorney Advertising / Site created by Pin Design Inc.

brd_r
Home Attorneys Client Updates News Client Rights Contact Us Labor/Employment Trust/Estates Litigation Corporate Trust/Estates Litigation